‘But if serving the Lord seems undesirable to you, then choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your ancestors served beyond the Euphrates, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land you are living. But as for me and my household, we will serve the Lord.’
In the ways of Christian salvation doctrine, one typically finds two schools of thought, and they are diametrically opposed, and my fear is, to our detriment. We have literally divided our own house, and worse, neither side willingly listens to the other. One school subscribes to ‘election’ [God has pre-determined who will and who will not be saved/born again – Calvinism] while the other claims ‘salvation is available to all’ [Arminianism] and this said position does not imply God to be unawares.
It is quite easy to see why both perspectives have gained a foothold from a Scriptural point of view, but selecting one or the other does not serve well the Body of Christ. Romans, Chapters 8, 9, and 11 speak to election while 2 Peter 3:9 suggests otherwise – as does Titus 2:11, and Matthew 28:18-20 [commonly referred to as the Great Commission].
In such a seeming contradiction, it behooves us to step outside of specifics and consider the whole – much like trees and a forest. To begin, God has always intervened in the affairs of mankind for if He didn’t, we would be mired in hopelessness and helplessness. In fact, we are described as ‘at enmity with God’, and as such, there is nothing within us that would seek Him apart from Him.
The Biblical record is clear, straightforward, with God electing to intervene by setting apart persons such as Noah, Moses, Joshua, Joseph, David, Solomon, Jesus, Peter, Paul, John, and so forth. In fact, God set apart an entire peoples – the Hebrews – to proclaim Himself to the world at large. There is no mystery to be found here in terms of God using peoples to be His ambassadors [Paul voices as much], with its culmination found in the complete work of His Son!
The work of Jesus made salvation available to all – first to the Jews and then the Gentiles, unlimited, no boundaries to be identified in the works of the New Testament. Paul, in Romans, did not negate salvation to all but was addressing the boundless beauty and glory of reconciliation – the mind of God! We are the ones who choose to limit the arms of God to but a few and are reaping an awful price for doing so, but I digress.
If election were valid, then why even proclaim the Good News of the Gospel? Is a very reasonable inquiry, for if God has indeed selected [elected], then there is no force in nor under Heaven to prevent His works. If true, it serves as an exercise of futility – for both the elect and non-elect —- the elect are wasting their time evangelizing and the non-elect have no standing. Think about it, return to the Garden of Eden, the opportunity for Adam and Eve to exercise their will is nothing but a ruse if they indeed had no choice. Further, did we not witness our Lord’s temptation in the wilderness much less His struggle in the Garden of Gethsemane? Even a casual observer could see the opportunities for choice! Maybe, just maybe, God was prepared for whatever paths chosen!
Further, where is the victory – much less love and adoration – if one has no voice? How is one compelled to love? Is there even a word for a ‘compelled love’ and what manner of love is being referenced in John 3:16? Gratitude? Absolutely, I am not going to Hell! Does this line of thought limit ‘that light which overcomes the darkness?’ Absolutely, it does! Have we become so dull that we now discount the miracle of the second birth? Election sure seems to sow that manner of seed!
Anyway, it is my contention that ‘salvation is available to all’ and that God has indeed set apart some, pre and post the work of Jesus. Truth be known, an elect is probably unaware of such a designation and would likely fold under its weight… would be akin to seeing God face to face. We must resist this need to ‘pick a side’ for the work is too monumental. If we are to pick one or the other, the better selection is ‘salvation is available to all.’ Election runs the risk of becoming stale, stagnant, and flirts with Phariseeism and worse, limits the atoning death of Jesus. Salvation available to all is as consistently seen in Scripture as is election. Maybe it is time that we give God all the elbow room He needs to transform lives —- is this not one of the central pillars in the story of Job?